Wide Leg Trouser Jeans
With Clean Hem
Style #: MDNMKT2335
Original Price$119.00
Original PriceNow $98.98
Wide Leg Trouser Jeans
With Clean Hem
Style #: MDNMKT2335
Additional Information
Description
Polished, on-point dressing can still be relaxed and carefree. The Wide-Leg Trouser Women's Jeans with Clean Hem by NYDJ are the ultimate feel-good style -; giving you both comfort and confidence. A flattering, wide-leg fit that flares at the ankles gives you a taller, legs-for-days look. Lift Tuck® Technology uses a proprietary slimming panel with a patented criss-cross design to shape and support your curves for an always-sleek silhouette, so you can look, feel and wear one size smaller. A clean hem completes this sharp-looking style. Features classic five-pocket styling, zip fly and button closure.
Fabric & Materials
- Lift Tuck® Technology uses a patented criss-cross panel to flatten in the front, while curve-contouring construction flatters your back side
- 70% Cotton, 13% Polyester, 10% Lyocell, 5% Elastomultiester, 2% Elastane
- Imported
- Zip fly and button closure ; 5 pocket styling
- Machine was cold, line dry
Fit & Sizing
- Inseam: 33"
- High rise: 9.75" (front)
- Trouser Wide leg opening: 23"
- Measurements taken on size 6
- Select one size smaller for the perfect fit
Recently Viewed
-
With Clean HemColor: clean cabrillo$119.00 $98.98Also In Short, Plus, Petite
Wide Leg Trouser Jeans is rated
out of
5 by
11.
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Karen L from
Most Awesome Jeans Ever!
This is my fourth pair of NYDJ jeans. The fit is amazing, no waist gaps, and they are extremely comfortable. They come out of the washer and dryer looking like new. Having read many reviews I agree that always ordering one size down from your normal size is best. Normally I wear size 8 which is what I ordered the first time, and although I wear them, the following three I ordered were all size 6. Those are perfect as are NYDJ jeans in total. I am 75 years old, 5'5" tall, and weigh 134lbs. I hope that information is of help.
Date published: 2019-02-05
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Jeanie from
Wide- leg, for sure!
these wide leg jeans fit wonderfully and are a beautiful washed color of light blue. I was not sure about the wide legs, because they are really, really wide! But when I wore them with higher heeled shoes they were wonderful. I don't believe they will be good with sandals unless they have a heel. The fabric is soft and yet not to send.
Date published: 2019-04-12
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Antoinette from
Love these jeans
If you are looking for the prefect flare jeans this is them, the fit perfect and look great with a great sneaker or loafer. I love them so must I bought a second pair. I always hear people say if u find the perfect jean buy another pair and that is the 1st time I did this. Thank u NYDJ
Date published: 2018-11-06
Rated 5 out of
5
by
twodears from
Great fit!
Really, really, liked these jeans. They fit perfectly, but I realized after they arrived that I would have preferred the darker color (which would look better on a mature woman), which was not available in my size. So I returned them today.
Date published: 2019-02-06
Rated 5 out of
5
by
CSMCSM from
Enough of the SKINNY Jeans
Love these jeans because they aren't 'skinny' jeans and they cover my ankles. Sometimes it's nice to wear jeans loose that have length to them. I feel much more comfortable wearing wide leg jeans.
Date published: 2019-03-07
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Barbara D from
love the overall fit
The only reason I did not give the jeans five stars is because they were long. I am almost 5'10" and I need to where a bit of a heel with them. They are definitely worth the money.
Date published: 2019-01-31
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Sandy423 from
Great Jean
These are really nice jeans. I'm sick of the skinny leg all the time. Unfortunately, they run larger than the normal NYDJ size and I had to return them.
Date published: 2019-02-10
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Lovely1 from
Liked the pants
Unfortunately they were too big, should’ve ordered size 12, if there was a switch item on return form I would’ve done that, had to return
Date published: 2019-03-04